Monday, September 14, 2015

GMOs

GMOs: Good or Bad? You Decide

Genetically Modified Organisms, or GMOs, are a growing part of our food industry that has caused much controversy. According to the World Health Organization, genetically modified organisms are plants, animals, or organisms that have had their genetic material altered in a way that does not occur naturally by mating and/or natural recombination. The main reason for GMO use in agriculture is for increased yields in production for our growing population. An example of GMO use includes corn injected with DNA from soil bacteria that is immune to specific pesticides that in turn makes the corn immune to these pesticides that otherwise destroy the crop. This type of corn is called RoundUp Ready Corn and is engineered by Monsanto.
One of the main reasons for speculation is the lack of research done on this way of production. Because GMOs have only been on the market for around 30 years the abundance of research that would show the negative effects of GMOs on the human body is low. Many wonder if GMOs will have similar effects as DTE and be discovered as extremely harmful. Currently, the only concerns by the World Health Organization are the possible allergies to genetically modified products, if the antibiotic resistant genes in some GMOs will transfer to the human body, and the migration of genes from GMO crops to conventional crops. As of now, WHO has not found any allergic effects relative to GM foods. However, they do encourage producers to not use antibiotic resistant genes due to the lack of current knowledge on the effects. Nevertheless, all GM foods on the market today have all passed safety tests.
There is much contemplation on whether or not GMOs will be the future for the food industry and for feeding our growing population. Before you make your opinions on the matter please be sure to do your research on the advantages and the drawbacks. Then make your own conclusion on whether or not GMOs are the answer for your lifestyle.

Written by Morgan Froebe, Intern for the Public Trust Law.

Tuesday, July 14, 2015

The Power of Environmental Activism

The government has so much on their agenda that sometimes very important issues slip to the bottom of the list, unnoticed and ignored. Many times this includes environmental concerns simply because many do not see the immediate impact of these issues and therefore flag them as of lesser importance. Thankfully, there are people out there that will not take no for an answer when it comes to the environment and fight in their communities daily to remind the public and government that the world we live in is threatened and needs saving.

It is equally saddening and inspiring that sometimes it takes young children standing up for an issue for action to be taken. That was the case for Pelican Island Elementary School students in Indian River County, Florida. These brave students expressed their concerns for the endangered scrub jay through presentations to the Indian River County Commission, the U.S. Representative, and even the Secretary of the Interior Department. They did not stop fighting for this beloved bird species until the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services granted $200,000 to the purchase of undeveloped lands to create a wildlife sanctuary for the endangered species.

Everyone knows the saying “It only takes one person to change the world” but does anyone truly believe it? Michele Tigchelaar of the University of Hawaii validated this empowering quote when she received 1,300 signatures, including students, faculty, and regents, on a school petition named “Divest UH” that fought against fossil fuels in Hawaii. The university has now approved the proposal, which said that the University of Hawaii would be divesting from companies that produce coal, oil, and gas by the year 2018. Word has reached the State Representative Chris Lee who is also the chair of the House Energy and Environmental Protection Committee. Lee supported the decision and commended UH and all involved.

Then there are times when success, no matter how small, is still success. James Blakely can attest to this as a Seattle activist against the Shell oilrig in the Arctic Ocean. Along with many others, Blakely attempted to stop what they call the “Polar Destroyer” which is more commonly known as “Shell’s Polar Pioneer” or the 40,000-ton rig that Shell has sent into the Arctic for drilling. In June of 2015 boats and kayaks created two separate barriers against the rig as it was heading out of the Port of Seattle. Unfortunately, the Coast Guard was on team Shell and helped the rig navigate around and through these barriers. Though this specific attempt was unsuccessful, the people did delay Shell and decrease the amount of time that the rig has for digging. Also, they showed the government, the Obama administration, and Shell that the people are not only against this but that they will not make it easy for Shell. Blakely says in a post on greenpeace.org, “If Obama won’t act to save the Arctic from drilling, then the people will”.


Environmental activism surrounds us every day in different shapes and forms. Whether you are saving a bird or saving the ozone, you can make a difference. Do not stand by and let others degrade this beautiful world we live in anymore. Stand up and remember that it really does only take one person to make a difference. Be that person.

- Morgan Froebe

Thursday, June 11, 2015

Honey Bees "Colony Collapse" Epidemic


Honey Bee numbers have been plummeting worldwide over the last several years.  This is especially alarming since honey bees provide a valuable service by pollinating agricultural crops.  There are multitude possible reasons for the decline; mite infestations, pesticides and pathogens, just to name a few.  However, one possible reason is the pathogen Nosema ceranae. 

This pathogen is bad primarily because it degenerates the digestive tissue in bees.  This causes malnutrition and reduces the lifespan of the bees.  Until recently, most thought this pathogen only infected adult bees.  However, new studies have shown that bee larvae can also be infected, further shortening the life of the bee once if it reaches adulthood.  This is not good for humans, since 35% of the world’s food crops are affected by bee, bird and bat pollination.  It is also not good for the State of Florida because Nosema ceranae is highly prevalent and somewhat resistant to treatment in warmer climates.  This means that bees in Florida are more susceptible to the pathogen than in more temperate climates.


Nosema ceranae can be controlled with Fumigillin.  With a warm climate and a large agricultural industry that somewhat relies on bees to pollinate crops, the State of Florida should make sure that this pathogen doesn’t further devastate the bee population.  Honey bee populations should be treated during the cold winter months and can be treated from September through February.  These steps can be taken to ensure that Florida’s honey bees and Florida’s agricultural industry survive and prosper well into the future.

But is Fumigillin safe to use?  Please tell us YOUR thoughts!

-Sean Combs, Legal Intern

Wednesday, May 13, 2015

Renewable Energy - How Is It Stored?

Renewable energies such as wind and solar energy has been around for decades.  Many predicted that it would supply most of the nation’s energy by now.  However, renewable energy only accounts for approximately 10% of the nation’s energy consumption.  This is a far cry from a majority.  Fossil fuels still accounted for over 80% of US consumption in 2014 according to U.S. Energy Information Administration.  There are several reasons renewable energy has yet to take a bigger piece of the U.S. energy pie.  Political opposition and costs are certainly factors that have hampered expanded usage of renewable energy sources.    However, there is another reason that many people might not even know is a problem that requires a solution.  That problem is, when renewable sources are not producing, such as when the sun doesn’t shine for solar energy and when the wind isn’t blowing for wind energy, where do you get the energy from?

Many think the simple solution is to store it with a battery.  However, for years battery technology simply lacked the capacity to store the required energy needed to supply energy on a large scale.  In 2003, the city of Fairbanks, Alaska plugged in a battery that is larger than a football field.  But even a battery that size only stores enough power to supply the town of 12,000 people electricity for seven minutes.  There is hope that solid state lithium ion batteries will eventually be able to meet this demand.  Companies such as Tesla are on the forefront of these technologies.

Another potential solution is to use the excess energy from renewables to make hydrogen fuel cells.  In this process, the excess energy is used to split water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen. The molecules are then combined in a fuel cell that creates an electro-chemical reaction resulting in electricity.   This is a potentially good solution because there is no limit to the amount of hydrogen that can be stored.

There are many other potential solutions as well and hopefully one day soon at least one of these solutions will become economically viable as a way to store the massive amounts of energy this country needs.  Until one of these solutions does become viable, don’t look for the U.S. energy pie chart to change very much.


-Sean Combs, Legal Intern

Tuesday, November 18, 2014

Tar Sands - More Than Just a Sticky Issue

Tar sands are composed of sands (ranging from loose to nearly-rock) mixed with clay and saturated with bitumen. Bitumen, or colloquially, tar, is a very dense, viscuous form of petroleum. People and bitumen go way back – all the way back. Since homo sapiens arrived on the global scene, bitumen was used for building construction, waterproofing boats, and more. Even before that, Neanderthals seemed to have used it as a component in their stone tools. Several ancient civilizations used bitumen as a gluing and waterproofing agent for various applications. This should also give you some sense of what a schlep it is to turn this mucky, sticky stuff into smooth liquid fuel.

But before we discuss how we get the oil out of the sand, how did it get there in the first place?

That’s a long story – billions of years long, in fact – but the short version is that when the Pacific Plate crushed up over the North American Plate, forming the Canadian Rockies, the sedimentary rocks composing a great deal of the Alberta plains were buried below. The increased pressure from the overlying mountains and the increased heat from (relative) proximity to the earth’s mantle transformed some of the organic material (specifically the kerogen) in those rocks into light oil and natural gas. The configuration of the regional geology was such that the oil and gas was seeped out and up toward the northeast, and as it reached shallower depths, it was discovered by microrganisms with strange appetites, who we can imagine had a great time as they ate it up and sent it back out as the sticky, icky bitumen we know today, in a process properly described as microbial biodegradation.

Tar sands can be found in several countries around the globe, but there are especially large reserves in Canada, Russia, and Kazakhstan. Of particular significance to the United States are the Alberta tar sands, which lie in the Canadian Boreal forest and contain about two trillion barrels of oil. The Athabasca oil sands near Fort McMurray, Alberta are the largest deposit in Canada. It conveniently reaches right up to the surface north of Fort McMurray, but the rest is buried about a thousand feet below ground. Thus only twenty percent of the recoverable oil in that deposit can be recovered by surface mining, which. The rest requires in-situ mining techniques, most commonly Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) in which two horizontal wells are drilled into the sands, one atop the other, and then the top one continuously is pumped full of steam, which “melts” the sands enough that they ooze into the lower well and can be pumped out.

As one can imagine, quite a lot of natural gas and water is needed to keep pumping the steam in and the tar out. In fact, every barrel of oil produced uses two to five barrels of water. Furthermore, the process of creating oil from tar sands is “carbon-intensive,” resulting in three times as much greenhouse gas emissions as conventionally produced oil. The land has to be cleared before mining can commence, and though naturally “steps are being taken” to mitigate against the negative effects on local plant and animal life, one has to wonder how much can really be done when taking huge swaths of land tearing away everything above ground and all the topsoil below. Furthermore, the Alberta tar sands are located on a delta used by hundreds of species of birds as a breeding ground.  Not only is the landscape annihilated for mining operations, but tailings ponds (pools of waste) sit on the surface throughout the area, threatening disaster in the event of failure and leakage. Even when all is well, tailings ponds are dangerous to the wildlife who mistake the toxic ponds for normal, safe water features.

Of course, as with anything there are costs and benefits. Although dangerous, deriving oil from the tar sands of course has its positives, too. These are almost entirely economic. For example, the oil industry has hugely improved the Albertan economy, providing jobs and future prospects for expanded production. The United States and Canada each benefit from having this near and fairly secure sources of the oil we still very much need, and of each also has the pleasure and convenience of doing business with its neighbor.


Finally, since Alberta is landlocked, getting the oil from the source to the distributor means building pipelines, which comes with its own additional demands on the environment as well. It’s easy to see why the extension of the Keystone XL pipeline has become an issue as sticky as bitumen.

-Amanda Hudson, Legal Intern

Elevation Zero, Florida’s Rising Sea Level

As a state that prides itself on its pristine shorelines and valuable waterways, Florida has more to lose from a rising sea level than any other state in the United States.  According to the United States Geological Survey, the average elevation in the state of Florida is 100 feet with nearly half of the state close to or at sea level.  Currently, the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is reporting the sea level is increasing at about 1.25 inches per decade.  As you can probably tell, this poses a huge problem for Florida if there is any sort of increase in sea level.  A rapid sea level rise could even eliminate some barrier islands that have had a critical place in protecting inland habitats.  The rising sea level would force many of Florida’s species to depart into entirely new ecosystems all across the state and into neighboring regions.

There are two major causes of global sea-level rise: thermal expansion caused by the warming of the oceans, and the loss of land-based ice, such as glaciers and polar ice caps, through increased melting.  The effect of the increase in sea level not only poses a threat to our precious beaches and shorelines, but it also potentially has an enormous effect on the state’s economy.  In 2011, Florida had over 87 million visitors, mostly here to enjoy the white sandy beaches Florida has to offer.  If sea level continues to rise at an exponentially alarming rate, it could devastate what makes Florida famous and what makes Floridians flourish.  According to the US Census, in 2008, 75.7 percent of Florida’s population was living in coastal counties.  Not only do Floridians value the coastline for our tourism industry, but it also plays an essential role for our residents.  Even a small rise in sea level will have side effects far beyond disappearing shorelines, including: flooding during rainstorms, storm surges from hurricanes, and saltwater intrusion into aquifers.  Whether the increase in climate is due to human activity or a natural cycle, a global sea-level rise will not only affect Florida’s natural magnificent beaches, but the communities we have grown to treasure.


-Adam Gruszcynski, Legal Intern