Monday, September 14, 2015
GMOs
GMOs: Good or Bad? You Decide
Genetically Modified Organisms, or
GMOs, are a growing part of our food industry that has caused much controversy.
According to the World Health Organization, genetically modified organisms are
plants, animals, or organisms that have had their genetic material altered in a
way that does not occur naturally by mating and/or natural recombination. The
main reason for GMO use in agriculture is for increased yields in production
for our growing population. An example of GMO use includes corn injected with
DNA from soil bacteria that is immune to specific pesticides that in turn makes
the corn immune to these pesticides that otherwise destroy the crop. This type
of corn is called RoundUp Ready Corn and is engineered by Monsanto.
One of the main reasons for
speculation is the lack of research done on this way of production. Because
GMOs have only been on the market for around 30 years the abundance of research
that would show the negative effects of GMOs on the human body is low. Many
wonder if GMOs will have similar effects as DTE and be discovered as extremely
harmful. Currently, the only concerns by the World Health Organization are the
possible allergies to genetically modified products, if the antibiotic
resistant genes in some GMOs will transfer to the human body, and the migration
of genes from GMO crops to conventional crops. As of now, WHO has not found any
allergic effects relative to GM foods. However, they do encourage producers to
not use antibiotic resistant genes due to the lack of current knowledge on the effects.
Nevertheless, all GM foods on the market today have all passed safety tests.
There is much contemplation on
whether or not GMOs will be the future for the food industry and for feeding
our growing population. Before you make your opinions on the matter please be
sure to do your research on the advantages and the drawbacks. Then make your
own conclusion on whether or not GMOs are the answer for your lifestyle.
Written by Morgan Froebe, Intern for the Public Trust Law.
Tuesday, July 14, 2015
The Power of Environmental Activism
The
government has so much on their agenda that sometimes very important issues
slip to the bottom of the list, unnoticed and ignored. Many times this includes
environmental concerns simply because many do not see the immediate impact of
these issues and therefore flag them as of lesser importance. Thankfully, there
are people out there that will not take no for an answer when it comes to the
environment and fight in their communities daily to remind the public and
government that the world we live in is threatened and needs saving.
It
is equally saddening and inspiring that sometimes it takes young children
standing up for an issue for action to be taken. That was the case for Pelican
Island Elementary School students in Indian River County, Florida. These brave
students expressed their concerns for the endangered scrub jay through
presentations to the Indian River County Commission, the U.S. Representative,
and even the Secretary of the Interior Department. They did not stop fighting
for this beloved bird species until the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services granted
$200,000 to the purchase of undeveloped lands to create a wildlife sanctuary
for the endangered species.
Everyone
knows the saying “It only takes one person to change the world” but does anyone
truly believe it? Michele Tigchelaar of the University of Hawaii validated this
empowering quote when she received 1,300 signatures, including students,
faculty, and regents, on a school petition named “Divest UH” that fought
against fossil fuels in Hawaii. The university has now approved the proposal,
which said that the University of Hawaii would be divesting from companies that
produce coal, oil, and gas by the year 2018. Word has reached the State
Representative Chris Lee who is also the chair of the House Energy and Environmental
Protection Committee. Lee supported the decision and commended UH and all
involved.
Then
there are times when success, no matter how small, is still success. James
Blakely can attest to this as a Seattle activist against the Shell oilrig in
the Arctic Ocean. Along with many others, Blakely attempted to stop what they
call the “Polar Destroyer” which is more commonly known as “Shell’s Polar
Pioneer” or the 40,000-ton rig that Shell has sent into the Arctic for
drilling. In June of 2015 boats and kayaks created two separate barriers
against the rig as it was heading out of the Port of Seattle. Unfortunately,
the Coast Guard was on team Shell and helped the rig navigate around and
through these barriers. Though this specific attempt was unsuccessful, the
people did delay Shell and decrease the amount of time that the rig has for
digging. Also, they showed the government, the Obama administration, and Shell
that the people are not only against this but that they will not make it easy for
Shell. Blakely says in a post on greenpeace.org, “If Obama won’t act to save
the Arctic from drilling, then the people will”.
Environmental
activism surrounds us every day in different shapes and forms. Whether you are
saving a bird or saving the ozone, you can make a difference. Do not stand by
and let others degrade this beautiful world we live in anymore. Stand up and
remember that it really does only take one person to make a difference. Be that
person.
- Morgan Froebe
Thursday, June 11, 2015
Honey Bees "Colony Collapse" Epidemic
Honey Bee
numbers have been plummeting worldwide over the last several years. This is especially alarming since honey bees
provide a valuable service by pollinating agricultural crops. There are multitude possible reasons for
the decline; mite infestations, pesticides and pathogens, just to name a
few. However, one possible reason is the
pathogen Nosema ceranae.
This
pathogen is bad primarily because it degenerates the digestive tissue in bees. This causes malnutrition and
reduces the lifespan of the bees. Until
recently, most thought this pathogen only infected adult bees. However, new studies have shown that bee
larvae can also be infected, further shortening the life of the bee once if it
reaches adulthood. This is not good for
humans, since 35% of the world’s food crops are affected by bee, bird and bat
pollination. It is also not good for the
State of Florida because Nosema ceranae is highly prevalent and somewhat resistant to
treatment in warmer climates. This means
that bees in Florida are more susceptible to the pathogen than in more
temperate climates.
Nosema ceranae can be controlled with Fumigillin. With a warm climate and a large agricultural
industry that somewhat relies on bees to pollinate crops, the State of Florida
should make sure that this pathogen doesn’t further devastate the bee
population. Honey bee populations should
be treated during the cold winter months and can be treated from September
through February. These steps can be
taken to ensure that Florida’s honey bees and Florida’s agricultural industry
survive and prosper well into the future.
But is Fumigillin safe to use? Please tell us YOUR thoughts!
-Sean Combs, Legal Intern
Wednesday, May 13, 2015
Renewable Energy - How Is It Stored?
Renewable
energies such as wind and solar energy has been around for decades. Many predicted that it would supply most of
the nation’s energy by now. However,
renewable energy only accounts for approximately 10% of the nation’s energy
consumption. This is a far cry from a
majority. Fossil fuels still accounted
for over 80% of US consumption in 2014 according to U.S. Energy Information
Administration. There are several
reasons renewable energy has yet to take a bigger piece of the U.S. energy pie. Political opposition and costs are certainly
factors that have hampered expanded usage of renewable energy sources. However, there is another reason that many
people might not even know is a problem that requires a solution. That problem is, when renewable sources are
not producing, such as when the sun doesn’t shine for solar energy and when the
wind isn’t blowing for wind energy, where do you get the energy from?
Many
think the simple solution is to store it with a battery. However, for years battery technology simply
lacked the capacity to store the required energy needed to supply energy on a
large scale. In 2003, the city of
Fairbanks, Alaska plugged in a battery that is larger than a football
field. But even a battery that size only
stores enough power to supply the town of 12,000 people electricity for seven
minutes. There is hope that solid state
lithium ion batteries will eventually be able to meet this demand. Companies such as Tesla are on the forefront
of these technologies.
Another
potential solution is to use the excess energy from renewables to make hydrogen
fuel cells. In this process, the excess
energy is used to split water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen. The molecules
are then combined in a fuel cell that creates an electro-chemical reaction
resulting in electricity. This is a
potentially good solution because there is no limit to the amount of hydrogen
that can be stored.
There
are many other potential solutions as well and hopefully one day soon at least
one of these solutions will become economically viable as a way to store the
massive amounts of energy this country needs.
Until one of these solutions does become viable, don’t look for the U.S.
energy pie chart to change very much.
-Sean
Combs, Legal Intern
Tuesday, November 18, 2014
Tar Sands - More Than Just a Sticky Issue
Tar sands are composed of sands (ranging from loose to
nearly-rock) mixed with clay and saturated with bitumen. Bitumen, or
colloquially, tar, is a very dense, viscuous form of petroleum. People and
bitumen go way back – all the way back. Since homo sapiens arrived on the
global scene, bitumen was used for building construction, waterproofing boats,
and more. Even before that, Neanderthals seemed to have used it as a component
in their stone tools. Several ancient civilizations used bitumen as a gluing
and waterproofing agent for various applications. This should also give you
some sense of what a schlep it is to turn this mucky, sticky stuff into smooth
liquid fuel.
But before we discuss how we get the oil out of the sand,
how did it get there in the first place?
That’s a long story – billions of years long, in fact – but
the short version is that when the Pacific Plate crushed up over the North
American Plate, forming the Canadian Rockies, the sedimentary rocks composing a
great deal of the Alberta plains were buried below. The increased pressure from
the overlying mountains and the increased heat from (relative) proximity to the
earth’s mantle transformed some of the organic material (specifically the
kerogen) in those rocks into light oil and natural gas. The configuration of
the regional geology was such that the oil and gas was seeped out and up toward
the northeast, and as it reached shallower depths, it was discovered by
microrganisms with strange appetites, who we can imagine had a great time as
they ate it up and sent it back out as the sticky, icky bitumen we know today,
in a process properly described as microbial biodegradation.
Tar sands can be found in several countries around the
globe, but there are especially large reserves in Canada, Russia, and
Kazakhstan. Of particular significance to the United States are the Alberta tar
sands, which lie in the Canadian Boreal forest and contain about two trillion
barrels of oil. The Athabasca oil sands near Fort McMurray, Alberta are the
largest deposit in Canada. It conveniently reaches right up to the surface
north of Fort McMurray, but the rest is buried about a thousand feet below
ground. Thus only twenty percent of the recoverable oil in that deposit can be
recovered by surface mining, which. The rest requires in-situ mining
techniques, most commonly Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) in which two
horizontal wells are drilled into the sands, one atop the other, and then the
top one continuously is pumped full of steam, which “melts” the sands enough
that they ooze into the lower well and can be pumped out.
As one can imagine, quite a lot of natural gas and water is
needed to keep pumping the steam in and the tar out. In fact, every barrel of
oil produced uses two to five barrels of water. Furthermore, the process of
creating oil from tar sands is “carbon-intensive,” resulting in three times as
much greenhouse gas emissions as conventionally produced oil. The land has to
be cleared before mining can commence, and though naturally “steps are being
taken” to mitigate against the negative effects on local plant and animal life,
one has to wonder how much can really be done when taking huge swaths of land tearing
away everything above ground and all the topsoil below. Furthermore, the
Alberta tar sands are located on a delta used by hundreds of species of birds
as a breeding ground. Not only is the
landscape annihilated for mining operations, but tailings ponds (pools of
waste) sit on the surface throughout the area, threatening disaster in the
event of failure and leakage. Even when all is well, tailings ponds are
dangerous to the wildlife who mistake the toxic ponds for normal, safe water
features.
Of course, as with anything there are costs and benefits.
Although dangerous, deriving oil from the tar sands of course has its
positives, too. These are almost entirely economic. For example, the oil
industry has hugely improved the Albertan economy, providing jobs and future
prospects for expanded production. The United States and Canada each benefit
from having this near and fairly secure sources of the oil we still very much
need, and of each also has the pleasure and convenience of doing business with its
neighbor.
Finally, since Alberta is landlocked, getting the oil from
the source to the distributor means building pipelines, which comes with its
own additional demands on the environment as well. It’s easy to see why the
extension of the Keystone XL pipeline has become an issue as sticky as bitumen.
-Amanda Hudson, Legal Intern
Elevation Zero, Florida’s Rising Sea Level
As
a state that prides itself on its pristine shorelines and valuable waterways,
Florida has more to lose from a rising sea level than any other state in the
United States. According to the United
States Geological Survey, the average elevation in the state of Florida is 100
feet with nearly half of the state close to or at sea level. Currently, the US National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is reporting the sea level is increasing at
about 1.25 inches per decade. As you can
probably tell, this poses a huge problem for Florida if there is any sort of
increase in sea level. A rapid sea level
rise could even eliminate some barrier islands that have had a critical place
in protecting inland habitats. The
rising sea level would force many of Florida’s species to depart into entirely
new ecosystems all across the state and into neighboring regions.
There
are two major causes of global sea-level rise: thermal expansion caused
by the warming of the oceans, and the loss of land-based ice, such as glaciers
and polar ice caps, through increased melting.
The effect of the increase in sea level not only poses a threat to our
precious beaches and shorelines, but it also potentially has an enormous effect
on the state’s economy. In 2011, Florida
had over 87 million visitors, mostly here to enjoy the white sandy beaches
Florida has to offer. If sea level
continues to rise at an exponentially alarming rate, it could devastate what makes
Florida famous and what makes Floridians flourish. According to the US Census, in 2008, 75.7
percent of Florida’s population was living in coastal counties. Not only do Floridians value the coastline
for our tourism industry, but it also plays an essential role for our residents.
Even a small rise in sea level will have
side effects far beyond disappearing shorelines, including: flooding during
rainstorms, storm surges from hurricanes, and saltwater intrusion into
aquifers. Whether the increase in
climate is due to human activity or a natural cycle, a global sea-level rise will
not only affect Florida’s natural magnificent beaches, but the communities we
have grown to treasure.
-Adam
Gruszcynski, Legal Intern
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)